Publication Ethics

The Ecovisi Journal of Economics, Business & Finance (EJEBF) is a peer-reviewed journal that upholds the highest standards of publication ethics and academic integrity. This journal strictly follows the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) to address all aspects of publication ethics, including the handling of research and publication misconduct.

This statement outlines the ethical responsibilities of all parties involved in publishing articles in EJEBF, including authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher (EcoVisi Publisher). The prevention of publication malpractice is a key responsibility of the editorial board. Any form of unethical behavior, including plagiarism, falsification, or fabrication of data, is unacceptable.

EJEBF adopts COPE guidelines to ensure best practices for publication ethics. The publisher has no right to interfere with the editorial independence and only supports the publication process in a timely and ethical manner.

Duties of Authors

  • Originality and Plagiarism – Authors must ensure that their work is entirely original. Any work or words of others must be properly cited. Plagiarism and self-plagiarism in any form are strictly prohibited.
  • Data Accuracy – Authors must present accurate and complete data to allow replication of the research. Fabrication or falsification of data is not allowed.
  • Multiple or Redundant Publication – Authors must not submit the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously.
  • Authorship Criteria – Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the study. All co-authors must approve the final manuscript and agree to its submission.
  • Acknowledgment of Sources – Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given.
  • Conflict of Interest – Authors must disclose any financial or personal relationships that may influence their work.
  • Reporting of Errors – If an author discovers significant errors in their published work, they must promptly inform the editor and cooperate in the correction or retraction process.
  • Confidentiality of Subjects – Authors should avoid including any information that could identify research subjects, unless necessary and with informed consent.

Duties of Editors

  • Publication Decisions – The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for deciding which manuscripts will be published based on quality, originality, clarity, and relevance to the journal’s scope.
  • Fair and Objective Evaluation – Manuscripts must be evaluated based solely on academic merit, without discrimination based on race, gender, religion, nationality, or political beliefs.
  • Confidentiality – Editors must maintain the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts and may only disclose information to relevant editorial staff, reviewers, and the publisher.
  • Conflict of Interest – Editors must not use unpublished materials from submitted manuscripts for their own research without written consent from the author.
  • Ethical Oversight – Editors must take steps to prevent the publication of research where misconduct has occurred and will follow COPE flowcharts in cases of suspected ethical issues.
  • Reviewer Selection – Editors must ensure that reviewers have the necessary expertise and no conflicts of interest with the manuscript’s authors.

Duties of Reviewers

  • Contribution to Editorial Decisions – Reviewers assist editors in making publication decisions and help authors improve their work.
  • Timeliness – Reviewers should complete their review within the agreed time frame and inform the editor if they are unable to meet the deadline.
  • Confidentiality – All manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents.
  • Objectivity – Reviews must be conducted objectively, with constructive feedback and no personal criticism of the author.
  • Acknowledgment of Sources – Reviewers must identify relevant work not cited by the authors and inform the editor of any substantial similarity with other published works.
  • Conflict of Interest – Reviewers must not review manuscripts where conflicts of interest exist due to competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with the authors or institutions involved.

Publisher’s Responsibilities

  • Editorial Independence – The publisher respects the editorial independence of EJEBF and will not interfere in editorial decisions.
  • Ethical Oversight – The publisher ensures that publication ethics are upheld and that all content meets international academic standards.
  • Maintaining the Scholarly Record – The publisher works to safeguard the integrity of the published record through corrections, retractions, and errata when necessary.
  • Support for Best Practices – The publisher provides resources and support to ensure the journal operates in compliance with COPE guidelines.

Disclaimer

The Editors of EJEBF make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all published content. However, they make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or completeness of the content and disclaim any responsibility for errors or omissions. The views expressed in published articles are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the editors or publisher.