Peer Review Process
The Ecovisi Journal of Economics, Business and Finance (EJEBF) applies a double-blind peer review process to maintain the quality, originality, and academic integrity of all manuscripts.
Initial Screening
All submissions are reviewed by the Editorial Team to ensure alignment with the journal’s scope, formatting requirements, and ethical standards. Manuscripts failing to meet these criteria may be returned without external review.
Plagiarism Check
All manuscripts are screened using plagiarism detection software. Submissions with a similarity index above the acceptable threshold will be rejected.
Reviewer Assignment
Manuscripts passing the initial checks are assigned to at least two independent reviewers with relevant expertise. Both author and reviewer identities remain anonymous.
Review Criteria
Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on:
- Originality and significance of contribution
- Theoretical framework and literature support
- Research methodology and data validity
- Clarity of presentation
- Relevance to the journal’s focus and scope
Review Timeline
Reviewers are given 2–4 weeks to complete the review. Authors may be asked to revise manuscripts based on reviewer feedback.
Decision Process
The Editorial Board considers reviewer recommendations before making a decision:
- Accept without changes
- Accept with minor revisions
- Revise and resubmit (major revisions)
- Reject
Revision and Resubmission
Authors must submit revisions within the given deadline and provide a detailed response to reviewer comments.
Final Decision & Proofreading
The Editor-in-Chief makes the final acceptance decision. Accepted manuscripts undergo copyediting and proofreading.
Publication
The final version is published online in the scheduled issue and assigned a DOI (Digital Object Identifier).
